stalled for 22 weeks at 1.0mg and I refuse to panic this time
water content. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/darkspot is downstream of it. Titration speed, muscle cramps, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort water content out first, and almost nobody does. I say this having got it wrong for 13…
the related substances line is where the story is
the related substances line is where the story is
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
the batch number or it did not happen
Small correction: the trial was 6 weeks, not 21. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Water content was 3.8%, acetate was 6.2%, purity was 99%, but net peptide was only 90% of the label weight. Perfectly honest, just chemistry.
Water content was 3.8%, acetate was 6.2%, purity was 99%, but net peptide was only 90% of the label weight.
Disagree on that part. 99.2% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
the counterion is part of the mass you paid for
post the whole document, not the headline number
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
Did they give you the chromatogram or just the summary line?
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters