19 months in and purity is still the thing I get wrong
Confession thread, sort of. I went from 2.5mg to 1.0mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 15 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway. So now I have…
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
the method line is doing real work, not just window dressing
axis labels included, always
axis labels included, always
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
the related substances line is where the story is
Small correction: the trial was 3 weeks, not 25. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Small correction: the trial was 22 weeks, not 19. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Flair changed to match the content.
Adding to this: area percent is doing more work than the comment implies.
purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial