GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
-78
c/compounding·posted 3 days ago by u/emil_okwuosa

the shortage list came off and my pharmacy stopped overnight

Regulatory

Genuinely asking, not being difficult.

Everyone in c/glp1canada repeats that shortage list is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 20 threads of people agreeing with each other.

Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because it has been repeated since 2023?

I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source.

217 up / 295 down42% upvoted8 commentsid 1mqt9h26 Jul 2026

8 comments

8 in this archive, depth 3

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/formulary_fighterMOD8 points·3 days ago

Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lift_heavy_thingsresistance training3 points·3 days ago

503B compounding is different from 503A, different rules, different legality

replysharereportpermalink
u/julia_erdogan2 points·3 days ago

The telehealth + compounding combo cost compounding plus 9% markup. Not cheap but covered by insurance depending on state.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rekha_mwangi0 points·2 days ago

The telehealth + compounding combo cost compounding plus 9% markup.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lipid_panel_larrybloodwork4 points·3 days ago

The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_okwuosaOP3 points·3 days ago

Yeah, 503A and 503B are different regulatory animals.

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_okwuosaOP2 points·3 days ago

API source questions are on-topic and compounders dodging them is newsworthy

replysharereportpermalink
u/step_count_stan3 points·2 days ago

I am going to push back on this slightly.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/compounding

Compounded GLP-1s as a supply route: the 503A/503B distinction, the shortage-list mechanics that made compounding legal and then didn't, state board rules, telehealth prescriber models, and what a compounding pharmacy will and will not tell you about its API source.

53kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/compounding rules
  1. Regulatory claims need a citation to the actual rule, notice or docket.
  2. No pharmacy referral codes. Naming a pharmacy is fine; recruiting for it is not.
  3. API source questions are on-topic and pharmacies dodging them is newsworthy.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.