[Question] Ireland — has anyone got a straight answer on weekly update
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.
I have been tracking log against eGFR for 11 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.
Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.
tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
public logs kept over 19 weeks and beyond
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet.
Adding to this: weight is doing more work than the comment implies.
the people still updating at week 35 are the reward
the people still updating at week 35 are the reward
Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
Not to be pedantic but dose history and tracking are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Not to be pedantic but tracking and dose history are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
consistency is harder than the dose change
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
the 23 month update is the real test
consistency is harder than the dose change
How many weeks between the two measurements?
This is correct. Long-term logs matter.
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
[removed by moderator]
logs that stop 8 days get Concluded flair automatically
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 99.3. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Not to be pedantic but log and tracking are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Not to be pedantic but log and tracking are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Adding to this: weight is doing more work than the comment implies.
the people still updating at week 74 are the reward
the 25 week mark is where it gets interesting
the boring consistency is the point
Did anything else change in the same window?
include dose and date on every update
- 1The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after…8 comments in this branch · started by u/honest_syringe
- 2n=1 but same8 comments in this branch · started by u/adaeze_cabrera