[Results] 91 weeks on 1.0mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring
FFMI. That is the whole post, but I will justify it.
Everything else people worry about in c/scamalerts is downstream of it. Titration speed, reflux, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort FFMI out first, and almost nobody does.
I say this having got it wrong for 14 months. My ApoB was the thing that eventually made me pay attention, which is a stupid way to learn a lesson that was in the sidebar the whole time.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Has anyone actually got this in writing, or is it forum lore at this point?
Yeah, protein matters on rapid loss.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
body-composition claims need a method
This is correct. DEXA is the standard.
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
Stalled for 10 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 92.
How many weeks between the two measurements?
How many weeks between the two measurements?
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 35 weeks to accept.
lean mass retention is the 96 week conversation
How many weeks between the two measurements?
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
body-composition claims need a method
- 1appreciate you saying you do not know7 comments in this branch · started by u/greta_perrin