GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of is it normal to get early fullness at week 94 — 65 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.1k
c/glp1women·submitted 1 months ago by u/tared_twice

is it normal to get early fullness at week 94

Resultsbranch of 7 comments

Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud. The advice on perimenopause in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers…

Read the full submission and all 65 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 1 months ago
u/aleksi_grimaldi23 points·1 months ago

contraception interaction claims need citation

replysharereportpermalink
u/nayeli_iyer13 points·1 months ago

Second this question. I have wondered about contraception for 18 months and never seen a straight answer.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kaia_fonseca8 points·1 months ago

pregnancy and trying-to-conceive get clinician pointer, not community advice

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_marchand2 points·1 months ago

the trials mostly studied men, perimenopause skipped

replysharereportpermalink
u/tared_twiceOP3 points·1 months ago

Stalled for 14 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 3.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tared_twice9 points·1 months ago

Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 94.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yusuf_ramos8 points·1 months ago

the cycle question is under-powered in trials

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/glp1women

The questions the trials under-powered: PCOS and insulin resistance, cycle changes, fertility signal and contraception interactions, perimenopause and menopause weight physiology, and the fact that the pregnancy answer is always "not while trying, talk to your clinician".

48kmembers
62submissions
Jul 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/glp1women
c/glp1women rules
  1. Pregnancy and trying-to-conceive questions get a clinician pointer, not community advice.
  2. Contraception interaction claims need a citation.
  3. No cycle-tracking data with identifying details.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hair_shed_hannahu/low_appetite_lisau/gentle_correctionu/wholesome_lurker
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →