small win: chromatogram stopped being a problem at week 95
Right, the HPLC question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 15 data points over 40 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 56, not week 10. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
a round-robin on baseline integration would be genuinely useful
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
a round-robin on baseline integration would be genuinely useful
What was the column and what gradient?
area% and mass% are not the same and this whole post conflates them
A shoulder on the main peak that 3 analysts integrated 26 different ways. Same trace, 99.0 spread.
axis labels included, always
state the method: column, gradient, detection wavelength, injection volume
Strongly agree. Largest single impurity tells a different story than total purity.
- 1a round-robin on baseline integration would be genuinely useful7 comments in this branch · started by u/careful_gradient