Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] the copay advice in here is 4 years out of date — 22 comments in the full submission. View in context.
239
[Discussion] the copay advice in here is 4 years out of date
external review. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/dosinglogs is downstream of it. Titration speed, muscle cramps, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort external review out first, and almost nobody does. I say this having got it wrong for 21…
This is correct. Appeal letters work.
What was the denial code?
resubmission after denial requires new documentation
This is correct.
Disagree on that part. 98.6% and 98.7% on the same vial is normal.
This is correct.
Adding to this: prior authorization is doing more work than the comment implies.