lane: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1
Right, the packaging question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 18 data points over 40 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 44, not week 93. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Yeah, the lane data is more useful than single reports.
Strongly agree. Customs adds unpredictable delay.
SGN ships from Spain, arrival is 17 to 34 days on average
origin to destination, carrier, transit variance
the reship outcome is data worth posting
Actual days or estimated?
Australia to Australia: CPC with 20 days is the average, variance is 34
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
GGPeps ships from Denmark, arrival is 14 to 10 days on average
Small correction: the trial was 22 weeks, not 13. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Yeah, the lane data is more useful than single reports.
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
packaging quality matters on the 12-hour segments
origin to destination, carrier, transit variance
transit time variance is the story, not the average
Yeah, the lane data is more useful than single reports.
no tracking numbers, no full addresses, no label photos — instant removal
- 1Yeah, the lane data is more useful than single reports.4 comments in this branch · started by u/tarek_lokken
- 2origin to destination, carrier, transit variance4 comments in this branch · started by u/amara_haddad