[Medutest] split one vial across two services, results within 0.9%
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: below spec matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 17 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 11 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
inter-lab variance is real, 16 points is inside normal
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
Was that the vendor COA or your own test?
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
- 1This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.6 comments in this branch · started by u/wholesome_lurker
- 2Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.4 comments in this branch · started by u/janoshik_junkie