GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Medutest] split one vial across two services, results within 0.9% — 13 comments in the full submission. View in context.
94
c/labresults·submitted 13 days ago by u/jonas_cardoso

[Medutest] split one vial across two services, results within 0.9%

Medutestbranch of 4 comments

Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: below spec matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 17 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 11 people measuring the…

Read the full submission and all 13 comments →

This branch

4 comments, started 12 days ago
u/janoshik_junkieMOD7 points·12 days ago

Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.

replysharereportpermalink
u/noor_cardoso3 points·11 days ago·edited

template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result

replysharereportpermalink
u/crp_curious1 point·11 days ago·edited

Was that the vendor COA or your own test?

replysharereportpermalink
u/jonas_cardoso2 points·11 days ago

testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.