GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
1.2k
c/labresults·posted 1 year ago by u/kenji_kimani

[Discussion] the Medutest advice in here is 8 years out of date

Discussion The Quiet One ×1 Slow Clap ×3

I have had 12 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.

Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 34 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.

The independent number came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.

Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.

1,734 up / 502 down78% upvoted34 commentsid 1l7dbf20 Aug 2024

34 comments

15 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/diego_szabo-6 points·1 year ago

QYB claimed 97.2%, PeptideMeter came back 98.7%. 24 points is inter-lab variance, no drama.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tuva_kirchner1 point·1 year ago

SGN / BPC / batch 6 / Janoshik / 99.3% — that is the shape

replysharereportpermalink
u/boots_or_bust1 point·1 year ago

QYB claimed 97.2%, PeptideMeter came back 98.7%.

Disagree on that part. 97.2% and 97.4% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lift_heavy_thingsresistance training1 point·1 year ago

template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result

replysharereportpermalink
u/arne_restrepo1 point·1 year ago

Batch number? Date of test?

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_nwosu1 point·1 year ago

inter-lab variance is real, 4 points is inside normal

replysharereportpermalink
u/meera_oyelaran1 point·1 year ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/piotr_nascimento151 points·1 year ago·edited
this is the answer
replysharereportpermalink
u/meera_sandvik38 points·1 year ago

This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kenji_kimaniOP21 points·1 year ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_vermeulen134 points·1 year ago

Yeah, the Medutest number matching the claim is the actual signal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kenji_kimaniOP56 points·1 year ago

Tested 6 batches from SWB over 87 weeks. Spread was 99.0% to 99.2, mostly 99.0. Consistent vendor.

replysharereportpermalink
u/edit_for_clarity19 points·1 year ago

inter-lab variance is real, 8 points is inside normal

replysharereportpermalink
u/milan_villalobos12 points·1 year ago

do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/labresults
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/janoshik_junkieu/medutest_melu/peptidemeter_patu/coa_janitor
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →