GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] the Medutest advice in here is 8 years out of date — 34 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.2k
c/labresults·submitted 1 year ago by u/kenji_kimani

[Discussion] the Medutest advice in here is 8 years out of date

Discussionbranch of 5 comments

I have had 12 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe. Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 34 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February. The independent number came back 93.7% against a claimed…

Read the full submission and all 34 comments →

This branch

5 comments, started 1 year ago
u/anders_vermeulen134 points·1 year ago

Yeah, the Medutest number matching the claim is the actual signal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kenji_kimaniOP56 points·1 year ago

Tested 6 batches from SWB over 87 weeks. Spread was 99.0% to 99.2, mostly 99.0. Consistent vendor.

replysharereportpermalink
u/edit_for_clarity19 points·1 year ago

inter-lab variance is real, 8 points is inside normal

replysharereportpermalink
u/milan_villalobos12 points·1 year ago

do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.