GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 13 years out of date — 38 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.8k
c/labresults·submitted 2 years ago by u/thandi_solberg

[Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 13 years out of date

Discussionbranch of 7 comments

Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking test results against triglycerides for 35 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here. Caveats up front: one person, one…

Read the full submission and all 38 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 2 years ago
u/diego_szabo542 points·2 years ago

Tested 2 batches from QST over 5 weeks. Spread was 95.1% to 94.2, mostly 95.1. Consistent vendor.

replysharereportpermalink
u/medutest_mel427 points·2 years ago

Slight fix: the number was 97.4, not 97.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kavya_radich193 points·2 years ago·edited

Not to be pedantic but below spec and purity are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

replysharereportpermalink
u/whois_wanda-16 points·2 years ago

sample of one, say so

replysharereportpermalink
u/medutest_mel357 points·2 years ago

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

replysharereportpermalink
u/priya_ogunleye442 points·2 years ago

reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result

replysharereportpermalink
u/georgi_chowdhury131 points·2 years ago·edited

Which Medutest service and what method did they use?

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/labresults
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/janoshik_junkieu/medutest_melu/peptidemeter_patu/coa_janitor
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →