someone explain batch to me like I have not read a paper in years
Confession thread, sort of.
I went from 1.0mg to 15mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 5 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway.
So now I have muscle cramps I did not need and a data point I cannot interpret. Two lessons in one.
Posting it in the hope that somebody at week 83 reads it before doing the same thing.
best — the order this archive was captured in
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with batch, not with what you concluded.
Small correction: the trial was 16 weeks, not 32. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with batch, not with what you concluded.
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
Adding to this: test results is doing more work than the comment implies.
the 95.1% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
Small correction: the trial was 19 weeks, not 40. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Small correction: the trial was 19 weeks, not 40.
Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
JEEP claimed 96.2%, Janoshik came back 94.2%. 16 points is inter-lab variance, no drama.
- 1testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different…10 comments in this branch · started by u/usp_appendix
- 2Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.4 comments in this branch · started by u/medutest_mel