batch: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1
Confession thread, sort of. I went from 1.7mg to 0.25mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 9 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway. So now I have…
Yeah, the VendorInvestigate number matching the claim is the actual signal.
Tested 20 batches from GL Biochem over 49 weeks. Spread was 94.2% to 97.9, mostly 94.2. Consistent vendor.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
the VendorInvestigate and Janoshik results differ by 20 points, both inside inter-lab variance
My VendorInvestigate result matched the vendor COA exactly, which is rare. GGPeps deserves that note in the directory.