am I the only one who found below spec harder than the injections
Been lurking in c/bloodwork for about 8 months and finally have something worth posting.
Short version: week 6, 7.5mg, and PeptideMeter is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 15 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle.
What I actually want to know is whether the people saying it does not matter have measured it, or whether it is just repeated confidently. Happy to be told I am overthinking this — I probably am — but I would rather overthink it now than at week 6.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The Medutest result at 99.0% was below the 98.9% claim. CPC retested at their cost and came back 99.0%. Logged as resolved.
The Medutest result at 99.0% was below the 98.9% claim.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
GGPeps product, PeptideMeter test, 99.1% result, batch 17, 6 days in transit. Logged.
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
I am going to push back on this slightly.
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
the Medutest and PeptideMeter results differ by 5 points, both inside inter-lab variance
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
- 1The Medutest result at 99.0% was below the 98.9% claim. CPC retested at…7 comments in this branch · started by u/ahmed_fonseca
- 2You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.5 comments in this branch · started by u/camila_kowalski