[Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on below spec
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 1.7mg, week 34, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — purity — and tracked it for 18 weeks. Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am…
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
This result fits the template perfectly.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 27 weeks to accept.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
inter-lab variance is real, 17 points is inside normal
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
inter-lab variance is real, 16 points is inside normal