GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] can we stop arguing about wiki until somebody posts a number — 27 comments in the full submission. View in context.
300
c/meta·submitted 4 months ago by u/enzo_petrescu

[Discussion] can we stop arguing about wiki until somebody posts a number

Discussionbranch of 6 comments

wiki. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/newbiequestions is downstream of it. Titration speed, muscle cramps, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort wiki out first, and almost nobody does. I say this having got it wrong for 15 months. My ApoB…

Read the full submission and all 27 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 4 months ago
u/kasper_cabrera-7 points·4 months ago

Yeah, the evidence standard works.

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_ivaturi1 point·4 months ago

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/naomi_erdogan1 point·4 months ago

moderation appeals go through modmail first

replysharereportpermalink
u/hedda_aguirre1 point·4 months ago

Second this question. I have wondered about meta for 15 months and never seen a straight answer.

replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_petrescu1 point·4 months ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.