GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of anyone else notice moderation kicking in around week 4 — 55 comments in the full submission. View in context.
863
c/meta·submitted 1 year ago by u/rasmus_kuipers

anyone else notice moderation kicking in around week 4

Discussionbranch of 5 comments

Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 15mg, week 53, sulphur burps present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — disclosure — and tracked it for 24 weeks. Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I…

Read the full submission and all 55 comments →

This branch

5 comments, started 1 year ago
u/marta_trevino10 points·1 year ago

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yannick_petrov-21 points·1 year ago

moderation appeals go through modmail first

replysharereportpermalink
u/rekha_mwangi1 point·1 year ago·edited

moderation appeals go through modmail first

Adding to this: rules is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_kuipersOP1 point·1 year ago

the evidence standards are rules

replysharereportpermalink
u/draw_up_dizzy1 point·1 year ago

the evidence standards are disclosure

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.