GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
1.3k
c/meta·posted 2 years ago by u/placebo_arm_pam

week 86 check-in — 11kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me

Discussion Clean Column ×1 Slow Clap ×3

Confession thread, sort of.

I went from 1.0mg to 15mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 3 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway.

So now I have constipation I did not need and a data point I cannot interpret. Two lessons in one.

Posting it in the hope that somebody at week 9 reads it before doing the same thing.

1,600 up / 336 down83% upvoted46 commentsid b2oz7p12 May 2024

46 comments

8 in this archive, depth 3

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/kenji_demir204 points·2 years ago

This is correct. Modmail first.

replysharereportpermalink
u/divya_bakken86 points·2 years ago

Genuine question — what concentration were you at?

replysharereportpermalink
u/emeka_chowdhury92 points·2 years ago

Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sanne_laurent26 points·2 years ago

Strongly agree. Transparency wins.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dizzy_on_standing78 points·2 years ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink
u/placebo_arm_pamOP29 points·2 years ago

the Netherlands here. Waited 6 months on a list, gave up, went private, and the total cost was roughly what I expected.

replysharereportpermalink
u/placebo_arm_pamOP17 points·2 years ago

rule-change proposals need concrete wording

replysharereportpermalink
u/hedda_aguirre21 points·2 years ago

the site talking about itself

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.