GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] are the c/vendorvetting evidence rules too strict (no) — 23 comments in the full submission. View in context.
257
c/meta·submitted 6 days ago by u/hamza_weiss

[Discussion] are the c/vendorvetting evidence rules too strict (no)

Discussionbranch of 7 comments

Quick one. Canada here. moderation works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US. Specifics: the route I used took 19 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the…

Read the full submission and all 23 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 5 days ago
u/blunt_coldbox2925 points·5 days ago

Strongly agree. Transparency wins.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hamza_weissOP11 points·5 days ago

Came off after 43 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.

replysharereportpermalink
u/chain_confirm_cpayments11 points·4 days ago

Strongly agree.

Adding to this: disclosure is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kenji_vasquez3 points·4 days ago

Strongly agree.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 61 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hamza_weissOP2 points·4 days ago

What was the batch number and which service?

replysharereportpermalink
u/tuva_iyer1 point·4 days ago·edited

the evidence standards are disclosure

replysharereportpermalink
u/chain_confirm_cpayments1 point·3 days ago·edited

the wiki is the source

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.comSponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →