GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Meta] how the ranking actually works, with the formula — 25 comments in the full submission. View in context.
455
c/meta·submitted 16 days ago by u/milos_trevino

[Meta] how the ranking actually works, with the formula

Metabranch of 8 comments

Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: moderation matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 2 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 37 people measuring the same…

Read the full submission and all 25 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 16 days ago
u/sanne_novak25 points·16 days ago
that is the funniest sentence i have read on this site
replysharereportpermalink
u/vikram_mbeki8 points·16 days ago

This is correct. Modmail first.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_mensah9 points·16 days ago

I am going to push back on this slightly.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sanne_novak6 points·16 days ago

sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly

replysharereportpermalink
u/marta_dziedzic5 points·16 days ago

Yeah, the evidence standard works.

replysharereportpermalink
u/divya_bakken7 points·16 days ago

the moderation decision is logged

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_duarte2 points·15 days ago

the moderation decision is logged

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 19 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/naomi_erdogan-31 points·15 days ago

rules, moderation, ranking, wiki

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.comSponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →