GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of small win: normal stopped being a problem at week 6 — 52 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.2k
c/newbiequestions·submitted 1 months ago by u/rekha_vestergaard

small win: normal stopped being a problem at week 6

Discussionbranch of 10 comments

Been lurking in c/hplc for about 15 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 68, 1.0mg, and what is is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 33 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle. What I actually want to know is…

Read the full submission and all 52 comments →

This branch

10 comments, started 1 months ago
u/gentle_correctionMOD125 points·1 months ago

Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]93 points·1 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_chukwu63 points·1 months ago

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/denied_again_d38 points·1 months ago

This is a good question, genuinely.

replysharereportpermalink
u/intent_to_treat13 points·1 months ago·edited

no dose recommendations for individuals, even here

replysharereportpermalink
u/asks_dumb_questions19 points·1 months ago

Small correction: the trial was 21 weeks, not 14. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/graph_it_gary12 points·1 months ago

Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with beginner, not with what you concluded.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nightowl_injector78 points·1 months ago

Not convinced.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ines_ekstrom69 points·1 months ago

be kind, condescending answers are removed

replysharereportpermalink
u/adaeze_cabrera26 points·1 months ago

Slight fix: the number was 95.1, not 94.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/newbiequestions

The deliberately gentle community. Every question that gets an eye-roll elsewhere lives here: what does titration mean, why do I feel nothing in week two, is this normal, what is bac water, what is a COA. Rudeness is removed faster than bad questions.

78kmembers
95submissions
Jan 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/newbiequestions
c/newbiequestions rules
  1. Be kind. Condescending answers are removed even when they are correct.
  2. Link the wiki instead of retyping it, but link it politely.
  3. No dose recommendations for individuals, even here.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/gentle_correctionu/asks_dumb_questionsu/reads_the_wikiu/wholesome_lurker
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →