[Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on bacteriostatic water
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: bacteriostatic water matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 7 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 35 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
stopper coring on the 23th draw because you keep using the same entry point. rotate.
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
Is that 30mg vial or 27mg?
Is that 30mg vial or 27mg?
Adding to this: mg/mL is doing more work than the comment implies.
dosing errors come from people reconstituting two vials differently and forgetting which is which
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
swirl, do not shake, or you are courting oxidation
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
bacteriostatic and sterile water are not interchangeable, do not use them that way
bacteriostatic and sterile water are not interchangeable, do not use them that way
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
more water means more units for the same dose, which means finer resolution
What was the vial size and how much bac water?
i am begging people to write down the concentration
- 1genuinely useful, thanks7 comments in this branch · started by u/kenji_kimani