[Discussion] we are measuring reconstitution at the wrong time and calling it noise
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 10mg, week 23, sulphur burps present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — concentration — and tracked it for 16 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
the concentration on the vial in marker is the most important step
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
Cored the stopper on my 2th draw because I kept using the same entry point. Rotate the puncture site.
i am begging people to write down the concentration
more water means more units for the same dose, which means finer resolution
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
u-100 syringe, not u-40, or your math is off by factor of 4
Show the arithmetic. Where did the units come from?