unpopular opinion: fraud is massively overrated
Genuinely asking, not being difficult.
Everyone in c/semaglutide repeats that exit scam is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 20 threads of people agreeing with each other.
Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because it has been repeated since 2023?
I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source.
best — the order this archive was captured in
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
The PeptideMeter results I got back showed 98.9% but QYB claimed 94.2%. Same vial, two services. I posted the receipts.
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 55 weeks to accept.
Which order and did you have any communication from MKM?
group buy exit scams follow a pattern
The PeptideMeter results I got back showed 98.3% but MKM claimed 98.0%. Same vial, two services. I posted the receipts.
the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
the BCH situation resolved, logged it here as resolved
sock puppet accounts ask the same leading questions
Rodent data is rodent data.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance
the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag
- 1Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell…13 comments in this branch · started by u/ferran_batista
- 2PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the…6 comments in this branch · started by u/aksel_jansen