fraud is the most under-discussed thing in c/reconstitution
Quick one. Canada here.
scam works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US.
Specifics: the route I used took 2 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost. The thing that would have saved me the most time was knowing which document to ask for at the start.
Happy to answer questions from anyone in the same jurisdiction.
best — the order this archive was captured in
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.
the GL Biochem situation resolved, logged it here as resolved
Batch 17 appeared on QYB, QST, and QYB claims it is raw material origin. Could be fine, could be reseller. Logged it in the directory.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 8–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
[removed by moderator]
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test
evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test
Adding to this: fraud is doing more work than the comment implies.
no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not
no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
group buy exit scams follow a pattern
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
Small correction: the trial was 9 weeks, not 31. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Which order and did you have any communication from KP?
Which order and did you have any communication from KP?
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 67 weeks to accept.
- 1evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or…5 comments in this branch · started by u/careful_gradient
- 2PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the…4 comments in this branch · started by u/blunt_coldbox_notes