GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Unverified] Homopeptide net peptide content came in under claim — anyone else on this compound? — 30 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.3k
c/scamalerts·submitted 5 days ago by u/receipts_or_nothing

[Unverified] Homopeptide net peptide content came in under claim — anyone else on this compound?

Unverifiedbranch of 5 comments

Flairing this Unverified deliberately. I have one result and one other member reporting something similar, which is not enough to call anything. BPC 10mg, batch HP-2502, VendorInvestigate, 96.9% against a 98.0% claim. That gap is at the edge of variance and I would normally shrug at it. What I am less relaxed about…

Read the full submission and all 30 comments →

This branch

5 comments, started 4 days ago
u/quant_not_qual189 points·4 days ago

Worth separating the two findings, because they are not the same size.

96.9 against 98.0 is 1.1 points and inside inter-lab variance. Ignore it. The net content figure is the interesting one, and the reason it is interesting is precisely that almost nobody measures it — so there is no baseline to compare against and no way to know whether this is unusual for them or unusual for everyone.

replysharereportpermalink
u/receipts_or_nothingOPvetting121 points·4 days ago

this is the honest state of it. i have one number in a field where there are almost no numbers.

replysharereportpermalink
u/aa_analysis_andy118 points·3 days ago

which is the argument for amino acid analysis becoming routine. if net content were on every document we would know within a month whether this is a vendor problem or an industry norm.

replysharereportpermalink
u/coa_collectorarchivist94 points·3 days ago

one in eight of my documents have it. if a hundred people asked on every order it would be standard inside a year.

replysharereportpermalink
u/test_it_yourselfvetting78 points·3 days ago

then ask. one sentence per order. the collective nagging works, it has worked twice already on packaging and on water content.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.