GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Question] PDF metadata — what am I missing here — 14 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.2k
c/scamalerts·submitted 6 months ago by u/marisol_frisk

[Question] PDF metadata — what am I missing here

Questionbranch of 5 comments

scam. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/researchpeptides is downstream of it. Titration speed, early fullness, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort scam out first, and almost nobody does. I say this having got it wrong for 20 months. My eGFR…

Read the full submission and all 14 comments →

This branch

5 comments, started 6 months ago
u/tuva_aalto186 points·6 months ago

The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]132 points·6 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/archived_thread_a61 points·6 months ago

Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marisol_friskOP24 points·6 months ago

The WXT exit scam collected 9 orders and disappeared. Order ids 24 through 9 all silent.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bianca_demir43 points·6 months ago

fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.