GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of is it normal to get constipation at week 94 — 46 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1k
c/scamalerts·submitted 1 months ago by u/neha_mwangi

is it normal to get constipation at week 94

Resolvedbranch of 7 comments

Confession thread, sort of. I went from 1.7mg to 0.25mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 7 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway. So now I have sulphur…

Read the full submission and all 46 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 1 months ago
u/cold_chromatogram31-1 point·1 months ago

This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_sandvik1 point·1 months ago

Not to be pedantic but PDF metadata and fraud are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

replysharereportpermalink
u/solene_ilunga1 point·1 months ago

the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting

replysharereportpermalink
u/ferran_batista1 point·1 months ago

Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with cloned site, not with what you concluded.

replysharereportpermalink
u/neha_mwangiOP1 point·1 months ago

PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sena_teixeira1 point·1 months ago

PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page.

Adding to this: group buy is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.