GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] SGN tirz — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6% — 17 comments in the full submission. View in context.
622
c/scamalerts·submitted 6 months ago by u/marisol_frisk

[Lab] SGN tirz — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6%

Confirmedbranch of 6 comments

Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 0.25mg, week 74, injection-site soreness present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — PDF metadata — and tracked it for 20 weeks. Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else…

Read the full submission and all 17 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 5 months ago
u/swirl_dont_shakereconstitution52 points·5 months ago
search before post, but also, welcome
replysharereportpermalink
u/georgi_tamm-7 points·5 months ago

This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lukas_delgado1 point·5 months ago·edited

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bianca_demir16 points·5 months ago·edited

Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/halima_boateng0 points·5 months ago

the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/scamalerts
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/scam_taxonomyu/coa_forgery_watchu/whois_wandau/sock_puppet_spotter
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →