week 6 check-in — 47kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me
Right, the A1c question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 7 data points over 32 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 29, not week 78. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
Did anything else change in the same window?
the 7 A1c trend is the answer
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
hypoglycaemia risk when stacked with A1c
Yeah, glycaemic control is the original use.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
[deleted]
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with metformin, not with what you concluded.
Not convinced.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
A1c, CGM, stacking with metformin
insulin and sulfonylurea interactions are real hypo risk
- 1Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.7 comments in this branch · started by u/joaquin_stanescu
- 2the 7 A1c trend is the answer4 comments in this branch · started by u/kaia_cabrera