GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] appetite return is doing more work than we give it credit for — 14 comments in the full submission. View in context.
232
c/tapering·submitted 1 months ago by u/ismael_eriksen

[Discussion] appetite return is doing more work than we give it credit for

Discussionbranch of 6 comments

Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/bloodwork repeats that interval stretching is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 20 threads of people agreeing with each other. Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is…

Read the full submission and all 14 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 1 months ago
u/vikram_asante60 points·1 months ago

regain on taper is expected, plan for it

replysharereportpermalink
u/maintenance_mode_maxMOD30 points·1 months ago

Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]13 points·1 months ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/nikhil_lindqvist-7 points·1 months ago

appetite return timelines vary tapering

replysharereportpermalink
u/salma_vasquez10 points·1 months ago

appetite return timelines vary interval stretching

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_eriksenOP44 points·1 months ago

Came off after 69 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/tapering

Stopping on purpose: dose reduction versus interval stretching, what the discontinuation arms of STEP 1 and SURMOUNT-4 actually showed about regain, appetite return timelines, and the people who came off, regained, and went back on without treating it as a failure.

20kmembers
62submissions
Jun 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/tapering rules
  1. Cite the discontinuation data rather than guessing at regain rates.
  2. No shaming people who restart.
  3. Say how long you were on and at what dose before you tapered.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.