someone explain tirzepatide to me like I have not read a paper in years
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.
I have been tracking SURMOUNT against ApoB for 7 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.
Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.
tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with tirzepatide, not with what you concluded.
the appetite change on tirz is more than just reduced hunger, it is different machinery
the dual agonism hits different and that is why people describe it differently
Hard agree. The food noise disappears differently on the two compounds.
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
the appetite change on tirz is more than just reduced hunger, it is different machinery
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 17–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
SURMOUNT data is messier than STEP data but the weight loss is there
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
Small correction: the trial was 21 weeks, not 6. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
SURMOUNT data is messier than STEP data but the weight loss is there
dual agonism is dual agonist, do not generalise from semaglutide
SURMOUNT data is messier than STEP data but the weight loss is there
nope, the equivalence to semaglutide is not known, comparing 15mg tirz to 2.4mg sema is guessing
Not to be pedantic but Zepbound and SURMOUNT are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
SURMOUNT data is messier than STEP data but the weight loss is there
the appetite change on tirz is more than just reduced hunger, it is different machinery
This matches the trial data. SURMOUNT-1 was 97.9% body weight at 22 weeks.
Hard agree. The food noise disappears differently on the two compounds.
stalled on sema, tried tirz, and the curves were actually different shapes
the 15mg is the top of the pen, not the required dose
Tried both. Sema worked, tirz worked better for me, but my reflux profile was worse on tirz.
Switched from sema at 0.5mg to tirz at 5mg. Different drugs, cannot compare the doses directly.
the 15mg is the top of the pen, not the required dose
Not to be pedantic but Mounjaro and Mounjaro are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
- 1The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after…18 comments in this branch · started by u/quiet_moderator
- 2Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is…4 comments in this branch · started by u/aurel_lindqvist