[Question] Sweden — has anyone got a straight answer on order records
I have had 19 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 20 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 99.0% against a claimed 98.0%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Yeah, FGP took 4 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard
Yeah, GL Biochem took 20 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.
Reship, credit, or they ghosted you? That matters.
The Janoshik and Medutest numbers on the same vial from JEEP came back 97.6% and 97.9%. Both are right, inter-lab variance is real.
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
Which service tested it and what did they come back with?
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
I am going to push back on this slightly.
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
FGP took 17 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
Is that a VendorInvestigate result or are you quoting the vendor COA?
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
- 1Reship, credit, or they ghosted you? That matters.6 comments in this branch · started by u/liv_dumitru
- 2Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.5 comments in this branch · started by u/nordic_pricing