608
[Question] hair shedding — is it the drug or the deficit
Quick one. Canada here. cycle works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice…
u/bastian_aalto
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Kaunas.
member · joined 14 May 2025
11,336post karma
4,617comment karma
5submissions
64comments
comment on [Vendor] KP reship policy actually honoured — receipts inside in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 4 days ago
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
comment on [Results] perimenopause, 18 months, and why the usual advice failed me in c/glp1women · 3 points · 9 days ago
This is correct. PCOS is real.
comment on [PSA] a vendor-supplied COA is a marketing document until someone else agrees with it in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 9 days ago
SGN order #15, Ireland, no drama, receipts inside
comment on [Explainer] the four things a COA must have or it is decorative in c/coa · 177 points · 15 days ago
axis labels included, always
comment on [Discussion] we have no vocabulary for success that is not a number going down in c/maintenancephase · 40 points · 18 days ago
the 15mg dose works fine for 72 weeks of the month
comment on anyone else notice research peptides kicking in around week 9 in c/researchpeptides · 4 points · 1 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 95.1, not 94.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on [Resolved] the QST batch dispute — vendor retested, numbers matched, my error in c/vendorvetting · 77 points · 1 months ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
comment on Spain: PCOS, and what it actually costs here in c/glp1women · 6 points · 1 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on [Vendor] MKM communication is slow but the material has been fine in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 1 months ago
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
comment on [Vendor] MKM communication is slow but the material has been fine in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 1 months ago
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
comment on [Vendor] SGN is a real company with real catalogue chemistry and people still doubt it in c/vendorvetting · 33 points · 1 months ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on group buy organiser vanished with 3.4k. here is the timeline in c/vendorvetting · 61 points · 1 months ago
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
comment on my A1c moved and I cannot work out whether identity is why in c/researchpeptides · 97 points · 1 months ago
Strongly agree. Evidence level matters.
comment on why does nobody talk about purity in c/coa · 4 points · 1 months ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is related substances. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
comment on anyone else notice certificate of analysis kicking in around week 75 in c/coa · 16 points · 1 months ago
axis labels included, always
comment on [Question] Sweden — has anyone got a straight answer on order records in c/vendorvetting · 8 points · 1 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on [Question] Sweden — has anyone got a straight answer on order records in c/vendorvetting · 18 points · 2 months ago
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
comment on [Question] Sweden — has anyone got a straight answer on order records in c/vendorvetting · 32 points · 2 months ago
The Janoshik and Medutest numbers on the same vial from JEEP came back 97.6% and 97.9%. Both are right, inter-lab variance is real.
comment on [Results] 7 weeks, 40kg, and contraception was the hard part in c/glp1women · 14 points · 2 months ago
This is correct.
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.