GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
3.9k
c/vendorvetting·posted 2 years ago by u/lina_almeida

[Vendor] QST order #11 — Denmark, 7 days, no drama, receipts inside

Vendor Well Actually ×7 Slow Clap ×3 Receipts ×2

Genuinely asking, not being difficult.

Everyone in c/maintenancephase repeats that order records is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 16 threads of people agreeing with each other.

Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because it has been repeated since 2023?

I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source.

5,055 up / 1,130 down82% upvoted36 commentsid 1hj1b614 Dec 2023

36 comments

23 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/freya_onwuka427 points·2 years ago

SWB order #10, New Zealand, no drama, receipts inside

replysharereportpermalink
u/ireland_drugs_pay359 points·2 years ago

Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.

replysharereportpermalink
u/pavel_kravchenko198 points·2 years ago

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ledger_modmod · vetting51 points·2 years ago

SSA order #4, Canada, no drama, receipts inside

replysharereportpermalink
u/naomi_ekstrom21 points·2 years ago

GGPeps order #22, New Zealand, no drama, receipts inside

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_sandvik5 points·2 years ago

independent test or vendor COA, which is it

replysharereportpermalink
u/teodor_lokken4 points·2 years ago

Which service tested it and what did they come back with?

replysharereportpermalink
u/boots_or_bust2 points·2 years ago

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (2) →
u/dilara_weiss-11 points·2 years ago

Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lane_map_larrylogistics1 point·2 years ago

This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_almeidaOP0 points·2 years ago

This order history matches mine almost exactly.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 79 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lane_map_larrylogistics102 points·2 years ago

receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]73 points·2 years ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/spreadsheet_gremlindata88 points·2 years ago

Mechanistically the bit that matters is Medutest. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.

replysharereportpermalink
u/receipts_or_nothingMOD33 points·2 years ago

This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/denied_again_d46 points·2 years ago

the PeptideMeter result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number

replysharereportpermalink
u/sena_ferreira10 points·2 years ago

Yeah, WXT took 18 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_almeidaOP17 points·2 years ago

independent test or vendor COA, which is it

replysharereportpermalink
u/ignacio_silva46 points·2 years ago

JEEP order #8, the UK, no drama, receipts inside

replysharereportpermalink
u/sterile_field_steph20 points·2 years ago

Yeah, FGP took 15 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.

replysharereportpermalink
u/mod_cold_roommod · c/coldchain16 points·2 years ago·edited

receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/vendorvetting
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/receipts_or_nothingu/paper_trail_paulau/batch_number_bertieu/janoshik_junkie
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →