[Discussion] can we stop arguing about PeptideMeter until somebody posts a number
Week 18 update. 4kg down from the start, muscle cramps basically gone since about week 70.
Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with muscle cramps.
The part that surprised me is how much of this is admin. Ordering, storing, logging, remembering. Nobody mentions that the hard bit is not the drug, it is the routine.
Happy to answer anything. Please do not ask me what dose you should be on.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The Janoshik and Medutest numbers on the same vial from SWB came back 98.1% and 98.0%. Both are right, inter-lab variance is real.
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
[deleted]
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
First order from HJ was great, second one had a different batch and tested lower. The vendor retested and credited me. Logged it here.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Homopeptide order #9, Sweden, no drama, receipts inside
Order date, product, and result, in that order please?
QST three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 99.2% anyway, so no harm done.
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard
the batch number or it did not happen
Not to be pedantic but order records and reship are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
the batch number or it did not happen
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 12 weeks to accept.
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 98.4% on the same vial is normal.
I am going to push back on this slightly.
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
Adding to this: VendorInvestigate is doing more work than the comment implies.
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
- 1Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.10 comments in this branch · started by u/solene_eriksen
- 2Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be…8 comments in this branch · started by u/marit_sandvik