GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] can we stop arguing about Janoshik until somebody posts a number — 20 comments in the full submission. View in context.
446
c/vendorvetting·submitted 1 year ago by u/throwaway_titration

[Discussion] can we stop arguing about Janoshik until somebody posts a number

Discussionbranch of 8 comments

Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 7.5mg, week 89, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — VendorInvestigate — and tracked it for 17 weeks. Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted…

Read the full submission and all 20 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 1 year ago
u/column_dead_volume22 points·1 year ago

Which service tested it and what did they come back with?

replysharereportpermalink
u/ipamorelin_i15 points·1 year ago

Yeah, WXT took 8 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.

replysharereportpermalink
u/greta_lokken21 points·1 year ago

one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread

replysharereportpermalink
u/reads_the_wiki-6 points·1 year ago

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

replysharereportpermalink
u/zofia_lindholm1 point·1 year ago

GGPeps order #22, Ireland, no drama, receipts inside

replysharereportpermalink
u/laila_almeida1 point·1 year ago·edited

the batch number or it did not happen

replysharereportpermalink
u/throwaway_titrationOP26 points·1 year ago

Tested 24 batches from MKM over 88 weeks. The consistency is the signal. They claim 98, they deliver 98.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]10 points·1 year ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.