1.2k
[Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on bacteriostatic water
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: bacteriostatic water matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error.…
u/batch_number_bertie
Same batch number on two different vendors means one thing and it is not good.
long-standing contributor · vetting · joined 24 Oct 2023
2,568post karma
11,419comment karma
3submissions
101comments
Overview — page 4 of 5
comment on vendor — my 9-week log, condensed into one table in c/vendorvetting · 6 points · 1 year ago
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
comment on is it normal to get sulphur burps at week 34 in c/bpc157 · 10 points · 1 year ago
near-zero controlled human data, full stop
comment on someone explain bacteriostatic water to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/reconstitution · 1 points · 1 year ago
Did you write the concentration on the vial?
comment on [Discussion] the ACHIEVE advice in here is 11 years out of date in c/orforglipron · 5 points · 1 year ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on [Discussion] the vendor advice in here is 9 years out of date in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 1 year ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on [Discussion] reconstitution is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/reconstitution · 12 points · 1 year ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify Medutest in c/vendorvetting · 292 points · 1 year ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on what changed for me between week 50 and week 93 in c/vendorvetting · 201 points · 1 year ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on [Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on bacteriostatic water in c/reconstitution · 81 points · 1 year ago
stopper coring on the 23th draw because you keep using the same entry point. rotate.
comment on handling is the most under-discussed thing in c/progresspics in c/researchpeptides · 26 points · 1 year ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
comment on dead space — 17 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/reconstitution · 8 points · 1 year ago
Cosigning. The concentration on the vial in marker is load-bearing.
comment on Spain: reship, and what it actually costs here in c/vendorvetting · 255 points · 1 year ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on what changed for me between week 60 and week 8 in c/orforglipron · 222 points · 1 year ago
small molecule, not a peptide, purity discussion is different
comment on what changed for me between week 60 and week 8 in c/orforglipron · 26 points · 1 year ago
cite ATTAIN/ACHIEVE arms specifically
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify units in c/reconstitution · 1 points · 1 year ago
bacteriostatic and sterile water are not interchangeable, do not use them that way
comment on [Meta] the PeptideMeter rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/vendorvetting · 23 points · 1 year ago
Tested 6 batches from QST over 47 weeks. The consistency is the signal. They claim 98, they deliver 98.
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on non-peptide in c/orforglipron · 55 points · 1 year ago
the absorption problem is solved by non-peptide structure
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on non-peptide in c/orforglipron · -24 points · 1 year ago
ATTAIN and ACHIEVE are phase 20 trials
comment on [Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 6 years out of date in c/vendorvetting · 27 points · 1 year ago
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard