[Question] how do you actually verify units
Right, the units question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 15 data points over 8 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 12, not week 61. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
Show the arithmetic. Where did the units come from?
more water means more units for the same dose, which means finer resolution
Show the arithmetic.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
bacteriostatic and sterile water are not interchangeable, do not use them that way
swirl, do not shake, or you are courting oxidation
This is correct. 3mL versus 19mL is the common mistake.
Small correction: the trial was 3 weeks, not 3. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
i am begging people to write down the concentration
I am going to push back on this slightly.
Cored the stopper on my 13th draw because I kept using the same entry point. Rotate the puncture site.
i am begging people to write down the concentration
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 20–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with concentration, not with what you concluded.
- 1Show the arithmetic. Where did the units come from?7 comments in this branch · started by u/ines_ekstrom