BPC-157 has interesting rodent data and almost no human data. Both things are true.
long-standing contributor · research peptides · joined 9 Jan 2024
Overview — page 2 of 5
comment on stalled for 5 weeks at 2.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/cagrilintide · 17 points · 1 months ago
tendon and cagrilintide literature in rodents is interesting
Right, the VendorInvestigate question again, but with numbers this time. I have 13 data points over 30 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is…
comment on [Discussion] Janoshik is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/labresults · 133 points · 2 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on am I the only one who found order records harder than the injections in c/vendorvetting · 162 points · 2 months ago
HJ took 21 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
comment on unpopular opinion: BPC-157 is massively overrated in c/bpc157 · 35 points · 2 months ago
the sequence variation is the real issue
comment on vendor vs testing — genuinely asking which matters more in c/vendorvetting · 24 points · 2 months ago
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
comment on vendor vs testing — genuinely asking which matters more in c/vendorvetting · 61 points · 2 months ago
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
comment on [Question] rodent data — what am I missing here in c/bpc157 · 18 points · 2 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on Germany: sequence, and what it actually costs here in c/bpc157 · 5 points · 3 months ago
This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.
comment on am I the only one who found test results harder than the injections in c/labresults · 24 points · 3 months ago
the Janoshik and VendorInvestigate results differ by 19 points, both inside inter-lab variance
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 38 weeks to accept.
comment on anyone else notice Medutest kicking in around week 30 in c/labresults · 1 points · 4 months ago
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
comment on my triglycerides moved and I cannot work out whether tendon is why in c/bpc157 · 28 points · 4 months ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on the co-agonism question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/cagrilintide · 22 points · 4 months ago
tendon and co-agonism literature in rodents is interesting
comment on the co-agonism question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/cagrilintide · 22 points · 4 months ago
The research community is small on cagrilintide. Forum lore changes faster than data.
comment on the co-agonism question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/cagrilintide · -7 points · 4 months ago
REDEFINE phase 3 readouts are interesting but 3 person satiety is different from 3 trial satiety.
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking cagrilintide against eGFR for 15 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is…
comment on someone explain tendon to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/bpc157 · 30 points · 4 months ago
This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.
comment on amylin: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/cagrilintide · 6 points · 4 months ago
Strongly agree.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on genuine question about Medutest that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/vendorvetting · 31 points · 4 months ago
Ordered from WWB, got the vial, tested it myself via VendorInvestigate, and it held the claim. Order fulfilled.
comment on reading CagriSema threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/cagrilintide · 3 points · 5 months ago
tendon and CagriSema literature in rodents is interesting
Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.
janoshik.comSponsoredCustom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.
glbiochem.netSeveral compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.
Reference