u/chidi_yilmaz
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Aarhus.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
Comments — page 5 of 5
comment on 23 months in and gas fees is still the thing I get wrong in c/cryptopay · 1 points · 1 year ago
no price talk, no tickers, no investment discussion
comment on the stability question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/coldchain · 18 points · 1 year ago
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
comment on small win: confirmations stopped being a problem at week 60 in c/cryptopay · 3 points · 1 year ago
Did you check confirmation speed on that chain?
comment on tried CagriSema for 12 weeks. here is what happened. in c/cagrilintide · 11 points · 1 year ago
Not to be pedantic but satiety and REDEFINE are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #3 — Germany, 3 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/glp1aus · 3 points · 1 year ago
shortage is different on the two sides
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring USDC at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/cryptopay · 367 points · 1 year ago
stablecoin is network, never volatile coins
comment on small win: satiety stopped being a problem at week 25 in c/cagrilintide · 0 points · 1 year ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on ATTAIN: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/orforglipron · 1 points · 2 years ago
ATTAIN and ACHIEVE are phase 3 trials
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 85 in c/cryptopay · 10 points · 2 years ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #16 — Denmark, 23 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/cryptopay · 36 points · 2 years ago
Did you check confirmation speed on that chain?
comment on 20 months in and non-peptide is still the thing I get wrong in c/orforglipron · 0 points · 2 years ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on 20 months in and non-peptide is still the thing I get wrong in c/orforglipron · 3 points · 2 years ago
Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 99.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on thymosin — my 9-week log, condensed into one table in c/researchpeptides · 33 points · 2 years ago
not approved for human use, full stop
comment on [Discussion] the small molecule advice in here is 17 years out of date in c/orforglipron · 0 points · 2 years ago
small molecule purity is different testing than peptides
Adding to this: orforglipron is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on stalled for 4 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/cryptopay · 21 points · 2 years ago
Sent orfo payment to the wrong chain. France, wrong network, vendor could not credit it. 9 day lesson.
comment on stalled for 4 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/cryptopay · 13 points · 2 years ago
USDC exists on 14 networks, vendor credits are network-specific
comment on stalled for 4 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/cryptopay · 5 points · 2 years ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.