u/cold_chromatogram31

Mechanistically the bit that matters is fraud. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.

This is correct. The shortage list does expire and the rules change.

Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.

Not to be pedantic but FLOW and endpoint are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 7–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.

reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations

The VendorInvestigate results I got back showed 98.1% but CPC claimed 98.4%. Same vial, two services. I posted the receipts.

PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.

Crossposting this to c/reconstitution because the people who need it are not reading this community.

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

Strongly agree. Phase 2 is investigational, not conclusive.

What are your reference ranges?

no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

Crossposting this to c/cryptopay because the people who need it are not reading this community.

Small correction: the trial was 12 weeks, not 14. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

declared value is customs, impacts duty

Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 18–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.