u/dose_creep_dan
Went up because the scale stalled, not because I needed to. Do not be me.
member · joined 19 May 2025
Comments — page 4 of 4
comment on reading semaglutide threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/semaglutide · 53 points · 2 years ago
Slight fix: the number was 99.1, not 98.4. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on week 36 check-in — 27kg down, sulphur burps manageable, one thing confusing me in c/semaglutide · 1 points · 2 years ago
This matches my experience almost exactly on the Ozempic pens. The titration is the whole point.
comment on switched from 2.4mg to 1.7mg and the injection-site soreness got better, not worse in c/semaglutide · 23 points · 2 years ago
okay but what dose of sema are you on
comment on Spain: meta, and what it actually costs here in c/meta · 96 points · 2 years ago
Strongly agree. Transparency wins.
comment on [Lab] 21th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/glp1science · 129 points · 2 years ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is pharmacology. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
comment on the plateau question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/semaglutide · 1 points · 2 years ago
pens are overpriced, research vials are research grade, same molecule different price
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on tried meta for 20 weeks. here is what happened. in c/meta · 5 points · 2 years ago
the ranking formula is meta
comment on tried meta for 20 weeks. here is what happened. in c/meta · 25 points · 2 years ago
comment on pharmacology — my 21-week log, condensed into one table in c/glp1science · 3 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, the incretin mechanism is doing the work here.
comment on disclosure: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/meta · 154 points · 2 years ago
the evidence standards are disclosure