u/ferran_dahlberg
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Bari.
member · joined 16 Jul 2025
Overview — page 3 of 5
comment on [Question] regret — what am I missing here in c/darkspot · 8 points · 3 months ago
Second this question.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on unpopular opinion: exit scam is massively overrated in c/scamalerts · 23 points · 4 months ago
Dated screenshot or is this from memory?
comment on anyone else notice endpoint kicking in around week 19 in c/trialwatch · 22 points · 4 months ago
number-needed-to-treat is the house dialect
comment on anyone else notice endpoint kicking in around week 19 in c/trialwatch · 196 points · 4 months ago
Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.
comment on week 21 check-in — 37kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/insurancefights · -9 points · 5 months ago
resubmission after denial requires new documentation
comment on someone explain lost money to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/darkspot · 41 points · 5 months ago
Strongly agree. No piling on.
comment on [Lab] SGN tirz — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6% in c/scamalerts · 125 points · 5 months ago
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
comment on is it normal to get injection-site soreness at week 4 in c/sideeffects · 4 points · 6 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on anyone else notice gallbladder kicking in around week 49 in c/sideeffects · 108 points · 6 months ago
IANAD and neither is anyone upvoting this
comment on 21 months in and pharmacology is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1science · 0 points · 7 months ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on three years of group buy threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/scamalerts · 63 points · 7 months ago
group buy exit scams follow a pattern
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about FFMI until somebody posts a number in c/glp1muscle · 6 points · 7 months ago
bathroom BIA scales are not a method
comment on tried gallbladder for 5 weeks. here is what happened. in c/sideeffects · 30 points · 7 months ago
early fullness at 1.0mg is different from 0.5mg
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify protein in c/glp1muscle · 6 points · 7 months ago
Not to be pedantic but FFMI and sarcopenia are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on [Results] 81 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/trialwatch · 137 points · 8 months ago
the relative risk reduction in headlines is not the whole story
comment on small win: PDF metadata stopped being a problem at week 40 in c/scamalerts · 11 points · 9 months ago
the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting
comment on 21 months in and sulphur burps is still the thing I get wrong in c/sideeffects · -33 points · 9 months ago
nausea on day 2 is normal, nausea after week 38 is worth checking
comment on 21 months in and sulphur burps is still the thing I get wrong in c/sideeffects · 137 points · 9 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on small win: hazard ratio stopped being a problem at week 51 in c/trialwatch · 189 points · 9 months ago
dropout handling matters, especially on GI-heavy populations
comment on why does nobody talk about fatigue in c/sideeffects · 1 points · 9 months ago
[deleted]
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.