u/ferritin_low

PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.

Did you get step therapy or outright denial?

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

My the food-noise thing was worst at 0.5mg and better at 10mg, which makes no sense and I have stopped trying to explain it.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

My early fullness was worst at 2.5mg and better at 2.4mg, which makes no sense and I have stopped trying to explain it.

Disagree on that part. 99.0% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.

the food-noise thing stops around week 92 for most people

amylin is not a GLP-1, posts conflating them get corrected

Strongly agree.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 34 weeks to accept.

This is correct. Appeal letters work.

Ozempic versus Wegovy versus research grade is the wrong argument, they are literally the same molecule

Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 29 weeks to accept.

the appetite change on tirz is more than just reduced hunger, it is different machinery

lowest effective dose is lowest effective dose, find it or stay higher

private plans vary by employer

nope, the equivalence to semaglutide is not known, comparing 15mg tirz to 2.4mg sema is guessing

nope, the equivalence to semaglutide is not known, comparing 15mg tirz to 2.4mg sema is guessing

Vial-splitting is on-topic here. Do not ask about pen-cracking, that goes in c/reconstitution.

Cosigning. The GIP contribution is real and the side effects are not simply scaled versions.

The SURMOUNT readouts are real but less consistent than STEP. Some people plateau earlier on tirz.