u/foam_head_fred

perimenopause and menopause weight physiology

PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds

no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are

Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.

Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.

Flair changed to match the content.

Adding to this: batch is doing more work than the comment implies.

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

Strongly agree. Phase 2 is investigational, not conclusive.

SELECT reported a SURMOUNT hazard ratio but the absolute event rate is what changes clinical practice.

absolute risk reduction, not relative risk reduction, that is how you decide

the BCH situation resolved, logged it here as resolved

group buy exit scams follow a pattern

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 2 weeks to accept.

area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters

the batch number or it did not happen

evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test