-61
what changed for me between week 5 and week 54
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking 503B against triglycerides for 29 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is…
u/formulary_fighter
Read the formulary exclusion list before you read the marketing.
long-standing contributor · appeals · joined 25 Jan 2024
7,281post karma
11,617comment karma
6submissions
153comments
Overview — page 2 of 5
comment on three years of special authorization threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/glp1canada · 20 points · 15 days ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on [Paper] amylin co-agonism is genuinely different pharmacology, not just more GLP-1 in c/glp1science · 61 points · 17 days ago
Which paper are you quoting?
comment on [PSA] semaglutide salt forms are not the same molecule as semaglutide in c/compounding · 29 points · 17 days ago
no pharmacy referral codes, naming is fine, recruiting is not
comment on [Win] HSA dollars changed the real cost by a third and i nearly missed it in c/insurancefights · 38 points · 18 days ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on unpopular opinion: dose history is massively overrated in c/dosinglogs · 3 points · 26 days ago
Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on genuine question about protein that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1muscle · 1 points · 27 days ago
Not to be pedantic but resistance training and protein are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on genuine question about protein that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1muscle · 133 points · 28 days ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
comment on province — my 19-week log, condensed into one table in c/glp1canada · 1 points · 28 days ago
name your province, coverage is provincial
comment on biased agonism: real, interesting, almost certainly irrelevant to your dose in c/glp1science · 6 points · 28 days ago
cite the paper: journal, year, first author, links optional
comment on unpopular opinion: step therapy is massively overrated in c/insurancefights · 3 points · 1 months ago
Which plan type? prior authorization is different.
comment on [Discussion] the lean mass advice in here is 19 years out of date in c/glp1muscle · 15 points · 1 months ago
DEXA is the real measurement
comment on [Discussion] the lean mass advice in here is 19 years out of date in c/glp1muscle · 21 points · 1 months ago
bathroom BIA scales are not a method
comment on half-life — my 3-week log, condensed into one table in c/glp1science · 1 points · 1 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about external review until somebody posts a number in c/insurancefights · 10 points · 1 months ago
Did you get step therapy or outright denial?
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about external review until somebody posts a number in c/insurancefights · 2 points · 1 months ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on 17 months in and Canada is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1canada · 36 points · 1 months ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on [Results] 92 weeks, 10kg, and special authorization was the hard part in c/glp1canada · 21 points · 1 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on [Discussion] the copay advice in here is 4 years out of date in c/insurancefights · 9 points · 1 months ago
the carve-out clause varies by employer
comment on the prior authorization question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/insurancefights · 8 points · 1 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.